Two years ago today, I spent my last partial day in Stockholm and in the evening boarded my first overnight cruise for Helsinki, Finland.
For a review, see these posts, all written about six weeks after the fact.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Walkin' In Memphis
*"Upper" and "Lower" Egypt are in reference to the flow of the Nile. The sources of the Nile -- the Ehtiopian Plateau (Blue Nile) and the Central African highlands (White Nile) -- are south of Egypt. So Upper Egypt is south of Lower Egypt (the Nile Delta).
Monday, September 7, 2009
I, Sphinxster
The Gizan Great Sphinx may be superlative in a few senses, but it is not the only sphinx in Egypt. In fact, at some point sphingine imagery became somewhat common; there's a roughly mile-long road between the Luxor and Karnak temples whose sides were lined with hundreds of smaller sphinges, many of which still survive.
Oh, and about the Sphinx's missing nose: I've always heard it was blown off by Napoleon's troops, who used it for target practice. But evidently that's a myth, since sketches from the mid-1700's show the nose already missing.
For more of my pictures from the Sphinx, click here.
* Sphinx comes from the Greek verb to strangle, the Greek Sphinx's method of dispatching those who could not answer her questions. As such, it's etymologically related to the word sphincter.
** And no worse than Egypt, essentially the Greek name for the country, which has little resemblance to the terms the ancient or modern Egyptians used for it.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Camel Ride: The Sequel
This time, the trip was significantly longer; the handlers led us a hundred yards or so down a small dune and then back up again for a trip of 10-15 minutes. Before Turkey, I'd never ridden a large animal. This time, I noticed that the saddle only had one stirrup; that led me to think of the severe ankle damage I'd likely sustain if I fell off. The inclined path didn't help either. The desert is somewhat rocky and uneven and it seemed that my camel kept stumbling and lurching a little as it went up and down, which made me more nervous. Much of the time, I had one hand on the reins and another hand on the post of the saddle behind me to secure myself. This awkwardness amused some of my fellow riders.
Another portion of camel rides that are somewhat disconcerting is that camels are too tall to easily mount or dismount while they are standing; so they have to crouch down for the riders. A standing camel, though, doesn't really want to go back down on the ground. So the handlers have thick sticks with which they strike the camel behind its front knees. This induces the camel to quickly kneel on its front legs and then more slowly lower its back legs. So the beginning and end of the rides are somewhat lurchy and I was never sure how the camel was going to react to this method of correction.
Here are some more pictures from my Giza camel ride.
Pyramid Construction Methods
When we visited the Pyramids, one idea that our guide Ahmed tried to disabuse us of was that the Pyramids were built by slave labor. He stated that some of the brute force of moving the multi-ton stone blocks could be done by "throwing people" at the problem. But, even in that case, there would be a need for careful, knowledgeable people around to set up and supervise the hauling, lest people be crushed, maimed, and killed on a regular basis.
Ahmed told us that there was archeological evidence that large teams (thousands, if not tens of thousands) of skilled artisans were employed by the Pharaohs to quarry and cut the blocks to exacting specifications. These people were well-compensated and probably carved the stones out of a sense of pride and something akin to a combination of patriotism and religious duty in order to give their God-King as perfect monument as possible. Ahmed said the precision with which the blocks fit together on all faces really couldn't be explained by masses of slaves chiseling at hunks of granite and limestone.
Here's a general wikipedia article on Pyramid construction.
On the subject of moving the stones into place as the Pyramid was constructed, many theories have been advanced over the years from sensible applications of physics and engineering such as ramps, levers, and logs to silly pseudo-scientific blather like aliens did it. One recent intriguing theory that Michelle's brother Troy told us about this winter involves the use of a spiraling ramp built around the periphery of the pyramid as the pyramid is built up. This idea, advanced by French architect Jean-Pierre Houdin and his father, says that a large external ramp was used to lay the foundation and then was deconstructed and used to build the internal ramp system. The idea is that a solely external ramp would have to be either too long or too steep, once the pyramid reached a certain height. This theory still seems to be controversial, but there is evidence of such a spiraling ramp structure within the Great Pyramid. For more, see this 2007 article by Egyptologist Bob Brier.
Another subject that comes up when discussing the Pyramids concerns the sheer size of the stones used. According to these wikipedia articles, the average weight of the 2.3 million stones that comprise the Great Pyramid is 5000 pounds and the largest stones weigh over 100,000 pounds. Given that the Pyramids were constructed over 4500 years ago, it's a question of how the Egyptians managed to move such massive blocks. Modern engineers don't know exactly how to duplicate this feat with the technology available to the Ancient Egyptians.
In the past year, I've learned of how Wally Wallington, a retired construction worker, uses basic physics to move seemingly impossibly heavy objects by himself with little to moderate effort:
He thinks techniques like these are all that are required to build ancient massive structures such as the Pyramids or Stonehenge. Watching him whip around multi-ton blocks, I'm inclined to agree. Probably since the Ancient Egyptian civilization was centered around building massive stone structures like the Pyramids, the Sphinx, and various temples, they became quite clever and adept at moving huge stones around over the centuries. And, once the building of these monuments stopped being an integral part of the culture, these techniques were forgotten. As better machines were invented in modern times, the need to rediscover these techniques faded and now they can seem pretty amazing.
Mr. Wallington's web site is a little clunky, but has some interesting clips and explanation. I'm almost tempted to buy his DVD.
I also wonder why his site doesn't seem to have been updated since 2007. I hope he didn't get an unhappy lesson about exactly how much inertia a 10-ton concrete block has.
H/T: Skeptoid author Brian Dunning
Ahmed told us that there was archeological evidence that large teams (thousands, if not tens of thousands) of skilled artisans were employed by the Pharaohs to quarry and cut the blocks to exacting specifications. These people were well-compensated and probably carved the stones out of a sense of pride and something akin to a combination of patriotism and religious duty in order to give their God-King as perfect monument as possible. Ahmed said the precision with which the blocks fit together on all faces really couldn't be explained by masses of slaves chiseling at hunks of granite and limestone.
Here's a general wikipedia article on Pyramid construction.
On the subject of moving the stones into place as the Pyramid was constructed, many theories have been advanced over the years from sensible applications of physics and engineering such as ramps, levers, and logs to silly pseudo-scientific blather like aliens did it. One recent intriguing theory that Michelle's brother Troy told us about this winter involves the use of a spiraling ramp built around the periphery of the pyramid as the pyramid is built up. This idea, advanced by French architect Jean-Pierre Houdin and his father, says that a large external ramp was used to lay the foundation and then was deconstructed and used to build the internal ramp system. The idea is that a solely external ramp would have to be either too long or too steep, once the pyramid reached a certain height. This theory still seems to be controversial, but there is evidence of such a spiraling ramp structure within the Great Pyramid. For more, see this 2007 article by Egyptologist Bob Brier.
Another subject that comes up when discussing the Pyramids concerns the sheer size of the stones used. According to these wikipedia articles, the average weight of the 2.3 million stones that comprise the Great Pyramid is 5000 pounds and the largest stones weigh over 100,000 pounds. Given that the Pyramids were constructed over 4500 years ago, it's a question of how the Egyptians managed to move such massive blocks. Modern engineers don't know exactly how to duplicate this feat with the technology available to the Ancient Egyptians.
In the past year, I've learned of how Wally Wallington, a retired construction worker, uses basic physics to move seemingly impossibly heavy objects by himself with little to moderate effort:
He thinks techniques like these are all that are required to build ancient massive structures such as the Pyramids or Stonehenge. Watching him whip around multi-ton blocks, I'm inclined to agree. Probably since the Ancient Egyptian civilization was centered around building massive stone structures like the Pyramids, the Sphinx, and various temples, they became quite clever and adept at moving huge stones around over the centuries. And, once the building of these monuments stopped being an integral part of the culture, these techniques were forgotten. As better machines were invented in modern times, the need to rediscover these techniques faded and now they can seem pretty amazing.
Mr. Wallington's web site is a little clunky, but has some interesting clips and explanation. I'm almost tempted to buy his DVD.
I also wonder why his site doesn't seem to have been updated since 2007. I hope he didn't get an unhappy lesson about exactly how much inertia a 10-ton concrete block has.
H/T: Skeptoid author Brian Dunning
Khufu Boat Museum
For a decade following its discovery, the boat was carefully reassembled. Now, there is a museum right by the Great Pyramid that houses the boat and other artifacts unearthed along with it. Here are my pictures from the Khufu Ship Museum.
Estonian Pyramid Connection
While looking over this list of the tallest historical structures, I realized I had visited another one roughly six weeks before seeing the Pyramids.
The Great Pyramid remained the tallest until 1311 when the Lincoln Cathedral was finished in England. I've never been to England, so I didn't see that. But the Lincoln Cathedral's successor was St. Olaf's Church in Tallinn, Estonia, which was the tallest structure from 1549-1625, when its spire burned down. Its been rebuilt at least once now, but is currently over 100 ft shorter than when it reigned.
For more pictures of St. Olaf's, including dozens of pictures of Tallinn from its observation deck, go here.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Pyramids
Khan El Khalili Bazaar/Al Azhar
At the end of the first day of our Egypt tour, we visited the Khan El Khalili Bazaar, which was founded in 1382. This was probably my least favorite part of the Egypt tour. I wasn't interested in buying anything and the narrow streets of the bazaar crowded with people didn't really interest me. I wandered around the streets a little, but it was difficult to take pictures without feeling in the way and the bazaar is an area they warned us about pickpockets and thefts. In short, I was tired and there wasn't much for non-shoppers to do to be entertained.
Here are the rest of my pictures from the bazaar area.
Call the Copts!
The most famous Coptic church in Egypt is the Hanging Church in Cairo, which my tour visited on our first afternoon. On our short walk to the church, two of our tour members separated from the group, causing a little stir. As I remember, we didn't find them until after we left the church.
Here are some more photos from my visit to the Hanging Church.
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Cairo Citadel/Mohammed Ali Mosque
On our first day, our first stop of the morning after crossing to the east side of the Nile from Giza was at the Mohammed Ali Mosque. This mosque, which was built by Mohammed Ali in the mid-19th century, is housed in a much older structure: the Cairo Citadel, the construction of which was started by Salah Ad-Din (Saladin) in the late 12th century. Parts of the citadel afford a great view of the sprawl of downtown Cairo.
On the subject of Saladin: You've likely heard that there's a lot of tension between Arabs and Kurds in Iraq and also Turks and Kurds. (The Kurdish terrorist organization PKK frequently kills Turkish troops near the border with Iraq/Kurdistan; Turkey made a small incursion into Kurdistan in retalliation to one such attack while I was in Istanbul.) As it turns out the great Muslim warrior and vanquisher of the Crusaders Saladin was a Kurd himself. I wonder if his heritage gets downplayed in modern Islamic history classes or if he's seen as an exceptional "good Kurd".
Here are some more of the pictures I took of the mosque and citadel.
Cairo
Here are a few pictures taken through the window of our van while riding between tourist sites around Cairo in November 2007.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)